Quote:
Originally Posted by Lunas Mom
Aggression is not a bad thing. .
|
I didn't say it was, but for me
Quote:
|
breeding (dogs) for using agression
|
is bad. People who train dogs for dog fighting breed those dogs for
"using agression".
Most honest CSV breeders attempt to breed dogs which would have trainable characters, i.e. their natural aggression would be under control and used for rational purposes only. Remember that the standard says that CSV should be "versatile in his uses" (sic!) as well as "lively, active, tough, obedient with quick reactions, fearless and courageous.". Nothing about agression as such, though definietely a shy dog will not be able to meet the standard requirement. I.e. if
shyness is to be considered the opposite of
agression, which for me makes no sense anyway*
.
That's why I asked what Jos meant and I think he meant the requirements of the standard, only used ambiguous wording.
* Shyness & agression come from the same source: insecurity. A dog that has good character after his parents, is well trained and self-confident is neither shy, nor agressive