View Single Post
Old 26-01-2010, 19:11   #20
Martab
Distinguished Member
 
Martab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Verona
Posts: 4,419
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikael View Post
-1 read Mijke´s post nr 2 and 8

Ii is to be 77-1 I think

Very best regards / Mikael
I understand that you wish to include only dogs with HD and ED results. And I think that this is the wish everyone has.
But in this moment we have to consider that dogs without ED results are included, whereas dogs with not positive ED results are excluded.

I believe that the FIRST STEP to be taken is to include all dogs with or without ED results, and not to discriminate dogs with "not perfect" ED results, as explained in the petition. (this is MY personal point of view, not the point of view of all the petitioners)

Only afterwards, we can think about new rules to be applied.
The point is that the actual situation is clearly unfair and discriminatory, and needs to be changed immediately.
Agreeing on the "new rules" to be applied is much more complicated, and requires reasonings to be shared...this is my thought but I am more than willing to consider different proposals
__________________

Marta & GlockArian
Martab jest offline   Reply With Quote