But why use A,B or C categories or colours that mean/indicate categories? Why not put letter symbols by the litters, and by clicking at them they would open the explanation, just like it is with the bonitation codes.
BX/BX (would mean both parents bonitated and X-rayed)
BX/X (both parents X-rayed, one additionally bonitated)
X/X (both parents X-rayed, none of them bonitated)
UX/X (one parent without HD result, another X-rayed, none of them bonitated)
UX/BX (one parent unX-rayed, another bonitated and X-rayed)
etc.
In this way boniation would be an important asset of the dog, but it's lack - not a particular disadvantage, HD result - a basic asset but the
lack of X , i.e. the UX - an indicated disadvantage.
In this way X/X would be the minimal standard advised to the buyer to look for, and XB/XB - the highest. On the other hand, the system would have more informative character than judgemental.
Any reaction to this?
