Go Back   Wolfdog.org forum > English > _Administration

_Administration Questions connected with Wolfdog.org, database and other technical matters....

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26-01-2010, 18:23   #21
sciamalaia
Senior Member
 
sciamalaia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mestre
Posts: 2,300
Default

Marta please let Mijke out from the list for the moment because it's not clear what he thinks about this last proposal.
sciamalaia jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2010, 18:28   #22
Martab
Distinguished Member
 
Martab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Verona
Posts: 4,419
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sciamalaia View Post
Marta please let Mijke out from the list for the moment because it's not clear what he thinks about this last proposal.
No problem, I only wanted to make clear that one thing is the petition posted by Navarre, and another thing is the discussion on how to set new rules for the stud list.
We now are in 77
__________________

Marta & GlockArian
Martab jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2010, 18:48   #23
Bille
Junior Member
 
Bille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: D 72213-Altensteig-Wart
Posts: 365
Default

I think it's important to publish all results and announce dogs in the list, which have a breeding license in their country.
It's my decision and my responsibility to take a male with bad results to my female. (surely it shouldn't be)
If all results are published without evaluating, mybe people will send more results to the database.
Like Ina and other breeders, I want to know as much as possible about the dogs and the next of kin.

Greetings Bille
Bille jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2010, 19:03   #24
Mikael
Scandinavian Member
 
Mikael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 1,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martab View Post
I understand that you...
Sorry Martab my falt I meant post nr 3 and 8 not nr 2 and 8

I´m Mikael not Mijke by the way

Best regards / Mikael
__________________
_________________________________________________
*Hronec, Rasty, Zilja * Kennel, Wolfdog of Sweden* http://kennelwolfdogofsweden.vpsite.se/Home.html
Mikael jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2010, 21:00   #25
jmvdwiel
Senior Member
 
jmvdwiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,061
Default

Yes you are totally correct
But you can call me Judith

whereas Jmvdwiel is "against of removing the dogs without ED results", but I guess not against including dogs WITH ED results, whatever the result is. Is it correct?
jmvdwiel jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2010, 22:32   #26
Martab
Distinguished Member
 
Martab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Verona
Posts: 4,419
Default

thank you Judith and Mikael
__________________

Marta & GlockArian
Martab jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2010, 23:15   #27
mijke
Senior Member
 
mijke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Warnsveld
Posts: 2,033
Default

Sorry for al misunderstanding by my fault!!

In post nr 8 I did mention with 75 - 1 :
75 for publishing - against 1 admin

So I am correct on the list!
__________________
Vriendelijke groeten,
Mijke

PS: I am not a moderator anymore!!
http://www.ursidaestee.wolfdog.org/voor%20wolfdog/handtekening/New%20format%20banner%20Wg.jpg
mijke jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2010, 00:42   #28
Mikael
Scandinavian Member
 
Mikael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 1,089
Talking

Thanks Mijke for clearing that all out...

Than it is 79-1 or 79-0 as Admin has not really voted yet
And I hope he will vote 80-0

Best regards / Mikael
__________________
_________________________________________________
*Hronec, Rasty, Zilja * Kennel, Wolfdog of Sweden* http://kennelwolfdogofsweden.vpsite.se/Home.html
Mikael jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2010, 10:00   #29
Nebelwölfe
Member
 
Nebelwölfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: am Hochrhein
Posts: 771
Send a message via ICQ to Nebelwölfe Send a message via Skype™ to Nebelwölfe
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bille View Post
I think it's important to publish all results and announce dogs in the list, which have a breeding license in their country.
It's my decision and my responsibility to take a male with bad results to my female. (surely it shouldn't be)
If all results are published without evaluating, mybe people will send more results to the database.
Like Ina and other breeders, I want to know as much as possible about the dogs and the next of kin.

Greetings Bille
I do have exactly the same opinion. How can we expect breeders to be honest and open to each other and talk/inform about diseases - if even admin of wolfdog.org punishes honesty? There shouldn't be any evaluation of any diseases since this doesn't help to keep our race healthy at all - as we can see in other threads. We only succeed if we work together.

Please publish all dogs.
__________________
Gruss, Petra

Nebelwölfe jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2010, 10:16   #30
canislupus
Junior Member
 
canislupus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 33165 Ebbinghausen/Paderborn
Posts: 400
Send a message via ICQ to canislupus
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by littlepeet View Post
I do have exactly the same opinion. How can we expect breeders to be honest and open to each other and talk/inform about diseases - if even admin of wolfdog.org punishes honesty? There shouldn't be any evaluation of any diseases since this doesn't help to keep our race healthy at all - as we can see in other threads. We only succeed if we work together.

Please publish all dogs.
exactly my opinion! Tanja
__________________
Alles wird gut!
http://www.mala-bosorka.de
canislupus jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2010, 11:08   #31
massimo
Senior Member
 
massimo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Prague 6
Posts: 2,109
Send a message via ICQ to massimo Send a message via MSN to massimo
Default

I would like to point out that the initial message of the list does NOT say that ALL dogs with ED0 or 1 SHOULD be on the list...not at all.

Quote:
we ask that it applies equal rules for the users of every country. It would be a democratic gesture to discuss the rules BEFORE they were applied, and it would also make the scientific motivations behind them clearer.
it intelligently says that being the site a private site, the owner can apply any rule he wants, but it would be best if the rules are CLEAR, STATED, and applied to ALL DOGS.

My position is the following, and I've expressed it many times.
Studlist: all dogs can be studs "advertise" studs then put limits and apply them.
It is authorised to use HDC in some countries, and in others not.
ED1 is also of common use.
But if WD wants to exclude these dogs, then be it, take ALL dogs with ED1 , HDC or WITHOUT results (official results, proven with copy sent to ADMIN or Margo in the past) OFF the list.
I made HD to Oliver when he was 14 months old...and forgot to make ED...which I made when he was 3 years old.
My choice...but Oliver deserves to be in the list in this case.

Massimo
massimo jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2010, 17:58   #32
Martab
Distinguished Member
 
Martab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Verona
Posts: 4,419
Default

A possible proposal we discussed in the Italian forum is: publishing all studs, and flagging with a particular symbol the studs that are in possession of all the requirements indicated by the Clubs.

A disclaimer at the beginning of the list together with a legend could explain:
- that dogs are included in the list together with HD and ED results (if available),
- that it is highly recommendable to check carefully HD and EH results;
- that according to "X" Kennel club only studs with (for instance) HD A to B, ED 0 should be used for breeding, and according to "Y" Kennel club..(to be completed with other requirements if different)
- that the symbol "#" means that the dog is in possession of all the requirements requested by "X" Kennel Club, that the symbol "¶" mens that he dog is in possession of all the requirements requested by "Y" Kennel Club...

The symbols I indicated are only an example; we could make different colors, or adding a column ...or whatever could be useful to identify "recommended" studs, without eliminating the others, and leaving breeders free to choose and/or evaluate.
I believe this way of proceeding could be a fair compromise between who wants rigid rules to be applied in order to safeguard the breed, and who prefers to be provided with as much information as possible about all existing studs
__________________

Marta & GlockArian
Martab jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2010, 19:27   #33
Mikael
Scandinavian Member
 
Mikael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 1,089
Question

I just want to ask when we are in the change the roles section, even if it might be a bit off topic...

Can a breeder put up for example a litter on this site even if the dogs is for example HD C/C X E/E or A/A X D/D ???

Is the only role now official HD result, no matter the result ???

Best regards / Mikael
 
__________________
_________________________________________________
*Hronec, Rasty, Zilja * Kennel, Wolfdog of Sweden* http://kennelwolfdogofsweden.vpsite.se/Home.html
Mikael jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2010, 12:49   #34
Ricky's Wolf
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,015
Default

is possible to have an answer from Admin please?
Ricky's Wolf jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2010, 12:56   #35
sciamalaia
Senior Member
 
sciamalaia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mestre
Posts: 2,300
Default

Admin Please!!! Lesten to us!
Pleeeeeeeease
sciamalaia jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2010, 14:45   #36
saschia
Member
 
saschia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bratislava
Posts: 936
Send a message via Skype™ to saschia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by littlepeet View Post
I do have exactly the same opinion. How can we expect breeders to be honest and open to each other and talk/inform about diseases - if even admin of wolfdog.org punishes honesty? There shouldn't be any evaluation of any diseases since this doesn't help to keep our race healthy at all - as we can see in other threads. We only succeed if we work together.

Please publish all dogs.
I agree with this 100%. You can put me also on the list.
__________________
Saschia
(Sasa Zahradnikova)
http://www.chiens-loup-tchecoslovaqu...ei-et-damon.ws
saschia jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2010, 22:10   #37
AMERICANI
Member
 
AMERICANI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 111
Send a message via Yahoo to AMERICANI
Default Exactly...

I plan on breeding in America. I have 2 males & 2 females. All from decent lines, and none with HD or ED results
(Piter has his as a "B", but I want to re-certify once I change to AKC/FSS Pedigree) results. I have a female (Estia) who was hit by a car at a young age. Her fractured hip is bad on x-ray. Her other hip is probably a "B" according to OFA. I don't like Italy's methods. I want to return to America with a reputation, preferably good in the sense that I haven't bred any bad dogs. NOR do I have the intention to. I want to do everything in my power to represent my country and my kennels as an asset to the breed.
Does anyone know the method of HD testing Mexico has. If I move there can I be listed as a breeder? Just curious....
AMERICANI jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2010, 12:56   #38
Ricky's Wolf
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,015
Default

admin has not responded to anyone.
But it seems to he has responded with updates on new lists of stud-dog.

2 examples

http://www.wolfdog.org/php/modules.p...ogs&country=IT

http://www.wolfdog.org/php/modules.p...ogs&country=CZ

Last edited by Ricky's Wolf; 08-02-2010 at 12:59.
Ricky's Wolf jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 13:25   #39
admin
Moderator
 
admin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Runningwolf View Post
admin has not responded to anyone.
But it seems to he has responded with updates on new lists of stud-dog.
The topic was solved already before the protest was posted on the forum. Long before it appeared the ED-1 dogs were again included on the stud dog list.

After hot discussion with some moderators I agreed with their arguments. So we decided to include all dogs also the ill dogs (if they have the stud dog rights). So it will be as it always was - on the stud dog list will be listed all dogs which have breeding rights in their countries. The only additional requirement will be: they must have official HD results HD-A, HD-B or HD-C.
The breeder will decide to possible use dogs with ellbow dysplasia, heart problems, epilepsy or other problems.

STILL excluded will be all mixes and not pure breed CzWs. But also stud dogs owned by people who also own/breed mixes. Here will be NO compromises.
admin jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2010, 12:25   #40
Ricky's Wolf
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,015
Default

[quote = Admin; 285.155] L'allevatore decide di cani possibile utilizzo con displasia ellbow, problemi cardiaci, epilessia o altri problemi.
[/ Quote]

well, has always been what we were trying to impress you. A greeting and good work
Ricky's Wolf jest offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 19:30.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) Wolfdog.org