Go Back   Wolfdog.org forum > English > _Administration

_Administration Questions connected with Wolfdog.org, database and other technical matters....

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19-01-2010, 20:03   #1
Navarre
VIP Member
 
Navarre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Roma
Posts: 5,998
Send a message via Skype™ to Navarre
Post About "stud list" on wolfdog.org

We are Wolfdog.org users; we are owners, breeders, interested spectators; some of us attend work camps, others use to go to expos; we have regularly ENCI registered dogs, a high percentage of whom have hip and elbow scores, and many of whom had their bonitace... opinions can be different, but in general we are all lovers of the Czechoslovakian Wolfdog breed and we love our dogs.
For us all Wolfdog.org has always been a precious mean of support, a source of knowledge thanks to its database, created thanks to the helpfulness of thousands of people that saw in the site set up by Margo and Przemek a true aid in the development of the breed, free from the conditionings and from the influences of big breeders and "lobbies ".
Its strength is the great quantity of data it gathers, also and above all the ones that someone wanted to keep hidden, together with the existence of few equal rules for everybody, without favoritisms for this or that faction.
Recently there have been some changes in the stud dogs list that have aroused some worries, it seems in fact that there has been a discriminatory treatment towards the Italian breeding dogs, in particular one:

  • Voice of Wolf z Molu Es, HD A - ED 0/1, has been excluded from the list without neither notices nor explanations, and only thanks to a thread on the English forum the owner has learned the reason:
“The dogs was removed because in the most cases the elbow problem were hidden by their owners and elbow problems start to spread among the breed. While before there were also none known cases of ED-dysplasia it is getting more and more problematic and every month I'm getting information about new ED-infected dogs.” (ADMIN)

But despite this declaration, all the dogs whose elbows were not tested or those with hidden results stayed in the list. Besides, the problem of the elbow dysplasia is complex and it’s not clear on what data the statistic has been evaluated, considering that until a few years ago the dogs’ elbow were not examined, and even today it’s only done in a few countries, (the 65% of the stud dogs with elbow scores is in the Italian list to 09/09/2009)* If the site is really a resource for everybody we ask that it applies equal rules for the users of every country. It would be a democratic gesture to discuss the rules BEFORE they were applied, and it would also make the scientific motivations behind them clearer.

dany
bonfiglioli
hayla
riko06
star
sunnyna
betti
piccolino
anastasia
laila
edha
jal
molisanodream
starjumper
erica&amy
elisaP
i piccy
Antarctica
arf
woland77
aly87
matteo&martina
valentina
frafairy
na
mogwai
divina
maya
ciao69
bricicca1
arnaldo it
venerusoangelo
giobi 81
tatanka1094
luca
pisculli
marco
zach
chiara.giardini
m.greta
Lyudmila Encheva
roby e gaio
sirius
zattilio
littlewolf
fede86
denial
odisseo
sciamalaia
robykut
MariNoor
amaguk
ezibaby
gilda
ste
chepi
ciao69
riko06
mat
littlewolf
hadankama
ovogibba
wolflinx
germans
ornella
vassel
laila
martab
navarre
__________________
Susanna & Gianluca & Andrea & Navarre & Isabeau & Brandimarte & Anastasia & Lana
Last Navarre & Beau Isabeau
Navarre jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2010, 20:31   #2
Mikael
Scandinavian Member
 
Mikael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 1,089
Thumbs up

Please add my name to the list to, I vote for 100% HD and ED result info on ALL Stud Dogs.

Best regards / Mikael
__________________
_________________________________________________
*Hronec, Rasty, Zilja * Kennel, Wolfdog of Sweden* http://kennelwolfdogofsweden.vpsite.se/Home.html
Mikael jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2010, 21:29   #3
mijke
Senior Member
 
mijke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Warnsveld
Posts: 2,033
Default

For me the most honest and objective way would be to publish all stud dogs on the list with their HD and ED results.

And breeders who want to use a stud dog are smart enough always to ask the owner for copy's of all the official results before covering!
And based on this info they can make their own choose for combinations.


And yes there are now dogs with hidden results, or without results. Because not in all countries (or breed clubs) it is common or obligated to make ED x rays.
So it will be good to when we explain and explain again in every country, on wolfdog and in club magazines why it is also important to make ED xrays!

Till now in Holland only 1 (!) CsW was tested for ED. And not because the other owners want to hide things!!!
But because it is not a common or standard procedure in my country. (only for some breeds) That is why I also did write an article about ED in the Dutch club magazine.
And I hope that in future more and more CsW will have ED results.

But for me it is not honest (and smart) only to remove the CsW's with positive ED results from the studdog list.
While all other males with hidden or without results can be on the stud dog list.
__________________
Vriendelijke groeten,
Mijke

PS: I am not a moderator anymore!!
http://www.ursidaestee.wolfdog.org/voor%20wolfdog/handtekening/New%20format%20banner%20Wg.jpg
mijke jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2010, 18:16   #4
Ricky's Wolf
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Navarre View Post
dany
bonfiglioli
hayla
riko06
star
sunnyna
betti
piccolino
anastasia
laila
edha
jal
molisanodream
starjumper
erica&amy
elisaP
i piccy
Antarctica
arf
woland77
aly87
matteo&martina
valentina
frafairy
na
mogwai
divina
maya
ciao69
bricicca1
arnaldo it
venerusoangelo
giobi 81
tatanka1094
luca
pisculli
marco
zach
chiara.giardini
m.greta
Lyudmila Encheva
roby e gaio
sirius
zattilio
littlewolf
fede86
denial
odisseo
sciamalaia
robykut
MariNoor
amaguk
ezibaby
gilda
ste
chepi
ciao69
riko06
mat
littlewolf
hadankama
ovogibba
wolflinx
germans
ornella
vassel
laila
martab
navarre
Mikael
Runningwolf
72 people......................................

Last edited by Ricky's Wolf; 22-01-2010 at 18:19.
Ricky's Wolf jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2010, 18:54   #5
Mikael
Scandinavian Member
 
Mikael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 1,089
Talking

Yes 72-0 this far

Equal rights and justice on the stud list please / Mikael
__________________
_________________________________________________
*Hronec, Rasty, Zilja * Kennel, Wolfdog of Sweden* http://kennelwolfdogofsweden.vpsite.se/Home.html
Mikael jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2010, 22:03   #6
z Peronówki
VIP Member
 
z Peronówki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Późna
Posts: 6,995
Send a message via MSN to z Peronówki Send a message via Skype™ to z Peronówki
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikael View Post
Yes 72-0 this far
73-0 now. I'm for explaining the problems and not for hiding them!
__________________
.

'Z PERONÓWKI'
FACEBOOK GROUP
z Peronówki jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2010, 22:14   #7
michaelundinaeichhorn
Senior Member
 
michaelundinaeichhorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bad Dürkheim
Posts: 2,249
Default

74, I don´t see any sense in not showing bad results in studdogs, I want to know as much as possible about studs and their offspring.

Ina
michaelundinaeichhorn jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2010, 22:29   #8
mijke
Senior Member
 
mijke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Warnsveld
Posts: 2,033
Default

75-1 You did forget my first post
__________________
Vriendelijke groeten,
Mijke

PS: I am not a moderator anymore!!
http://www.ursidaestee.wolfdog.org/voor%20wolfdog/handtekening/New%20format%20banner%20Wg.jpg
mijke jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2010, 22:56   #9
Nebulosa
Moderator
 
Nebulosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Rio Grande do Sul
Posts: 1,334
Send a message via ICQ to Nebulosa Send a message via MSN to Nebulosa Send a message via Skype™ to Nebulosa
Default

76

Maybe we should actualize the list?
__________________
http://www.wolfdog.org/forum/signaturepics/sigpic1100_1.gif
Nebulosa jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2010, 23:31   #10
massimo
Senior Member
 
massimo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Prague 6
Posts: 2,090
Send a message via ICQ to massimo Send a message via MSN to massimo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by z Peronówki View Post
73-0 now. I'm for explaining the problems and not for hiding them!
???
ehm...
Margo? you are Margo joining a list which is against some rules of the woldog.org site....owned by ....Margo?

I'm confused!!

I wrote long time ago I was against putting IN the list dogs without ED test and putting OUT of the list dogs with ED 1 test, it is absurd and useless;as if you punish who makes the test and prize who doesn't.

But...who made the rules of the studlist that we are petitioning against?
it has been there for a long time...
__________________
----------
Oliver & Lunatica
massimo jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2010, 14:42   #11
massimo
Senior Member
 
massimo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Prague 6
Posts: 2,090
Send a message via ICQ to massimo Send a message via MSN to massimo
Default

Paula moved away the part about "Admin" and I agree on creation of new thread but...this part was moved away, I think it was coherent to the thread:
Quote:
Coming back to the main argument, I wrote already 4 months ago,addressing to ADMIN:
"If a dog with declared but not proven ED 0 goes on the stud list and a dog with proven ED0/1 doesn't.... it's automatic that you are PUSHING people NOT to declare bad elbows... as many other may be in the stud list."
and now it seems many many others are joining the same point of view.
Quote:
The discussion about studlist is open since september, nothing has changed.
Now more than 75 people, users of WD.org, show their disagreement on a rule of WD.org and we really are not sure if we are being heard by the right person.
Will ADMIN listen to our "plead" (which now is stronger than 4 months ago...)?
__________________
----------
Oliver & Lunatica
massimo jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2010, 15:39   #12
jmvdwiel
Senior Member
 
jmvdwiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,061
Default

I'm against of moving the dogs wih ED problems of the list, in Holland as Mijke already mentioned ED is not nescessary yet for breeding.

That is the reason why I didn't do the test yet, If my dog would be selected as a stud dog (which I now think he is to young for), than I can still make the x-ray if the female is x-rayed.

For now I don't have any problems, so for his health I don't have to make the pictures, and of course I know you cannot believe somebody on his/her words.
So why not just put the results in the list, so that every breeder can select the right male/female for his/her dog, I don't think the average wolfdog visitor is THAT stupid that he cannot make a choice for himself.

So I am AGAINST of removing the dogs without he ED results.

Last edited by jmvdwiel; 23-01-2010 at 19:18.
jmvdwiel jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2010, 18:47   #13
Nebulosa
Moderator
 
Nebulosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Rio Grande do Sul
Posts: 1,334
Send a message via ICQ to Nebulosa Send a message via MSN to Nebulosa Send a message via Skype™ to Nebulosa
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by massimo View Post
Paula moved away the part about "Admin"
Some kind of sleepwalking.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmvdwiel View Post
So I am AGAINST of removing the dogs without he ED results.
I think people need a time to get adaptated, also I dont believe some people will make the dogs pass again for the anesthesie only for make ED results.
Would be more fair if start to require the ED results for the new stud dogs, dogs born from half of 2008 ahead.
__________________
http://www.wolfdog.org/forum/signaturepics/sigpic1100_1.gif
Nebulosa jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2010, 19:19   #14
jmvdwiel
Senior Member
 
jmvdwiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,061
Default

I don't think you need anaesthesia for the elbows (with a normal dog )
jmvdwiel jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-01-2010, 13:53   #15
Rona
Distinguished Member
 
Rona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kraków
Posts: 3,509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by massimo View Post
.
Now more than 75 people, users of WD.org, show their disagreement on a rule of WD.org and we really are not sure if we are being heard by the right person.
You may add me too. I don't care very much about this particular issue, but if it might help, I support the majority!
__________________

Rona jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-01-2010, 17:01   #16
AMERICANI
Member
 
AMERICANI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 111
Send a message via Yahoo to AMERICANI
Default AmeriCani Kennels

Please add me too!
AMERICANI jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2010, 18:31   #17
Martab
Distinguished Member
 
Martab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Verona
Posts: 4,419
Default

Hallo, nice to meet everyone!

Let's actualize the list:
dany
bonfiglioli
hayla
riko06
star
sunnyna
betti
piccolino
anastasia
laila
edha
jal
molisanodream
starjumper
erica&amy
elisaP
i piccy
Antarctica
arf
woland77
aly87
matteo&martina
valentina
frafairy
na
mogwai
divina
maya
ciao69
bricicca1
arnaldo it
venerusoangelo
giobi 81
tatanka1094
luca
pisculli
marco
zach
chiara.giardini
m.greta
Lyudmila Encheva
roby e gaio
sirius
zattilio
littlewolf
fede86
denial
odisseo
sciamalaia
robykut
MariNoor
amaguk
ezibaby
gilda
ste
chepi
ciao69
riko06
mat
littlewolf
hadankama
ovogibba
wolflinx
germans
ornella
vassel
laila
martab
navarre
Mikael
Runningwolf
z Peronoòwki
michaelundinaeicchorn
mijke
Nebulosa
Rona
Americani

whereas Jmvdwiel is "against of removing the dogs without ED results", but I guess not against including dogs WITH ED results, whatever the result is. Is it correct?
Are we in 78 or 79?
__________________

Marta & GlockArian
Martab jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2010, 18:46   #18
sciamalaia
Senior Member
 
sciamalaia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mestre
Posts: 2,300
Default

I think we should include dogs with any results of ED in the list and not to exclude people who do not have the results yet.
I think it is better to know that hiding, since it is not an official list of a specific club .
If I'm wrong or if you do not agree please say your opinion ..
sciamalaia jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2010, 18:55   #19
Mikael
Scandinavian Member
 
Mikael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 1,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martab View Post
Hallo, nice to meet everyone!

Let's actualize the list:
dany
bonfiglioli
hayla
riko06
star
sunnyna
betti
piccolino
anastasia
laila
edha
jal
molisanodream
starjumper
erica&amy
elisaP
i piccy
Antarctica
arf
woland77
aly87
matteo&martina
valentina
frafairy
na
mogwai
divina
maya
ciao69
bricicca1
arnaldo it
venerusoangelo
giobi 81
tatanka1094
luca
pisculli
marco
zach
chiara.giardini
m.greta
Lyudmila Encheva
roby e gaio
sirius
zattilio
littlewolf
fede86
denial
odisseo
sciamalaia
robykut
MariNoor
amaguk
ezibaby
gilda
ste
chepi
ciao69
riko06
mat
littlewolf
hadankama
ovogibba
wolflinx
germans
ornella
vassel
laila
martab
navarre
Mikael
Runningwolf
z Peronoòwki
michaelundinaeicchorn
mijke
Nebulosa
Rona
Americani

whereas Jmvdwiel is "against of removing the dogs without ED results", but I guess not against including dogs WITH ED results, whatever the result is. Is it correct?
Are we in 78 or 79?
-1 read Mijke´s post nr 3 and 8

It is to be 77-1 I think

Very best regards / Mikael
__________________
_________________________________________________
*Hronec, Rasty, Zilja * Kennel, Wolfdog of Sweden* http://kennelwolfdogofsweden.vpsite.se/Home.html

Last edited by Mikael; 26-01-2010 at 19:59. Reason: Sorry I meant post nr 3 not 2
Mikael jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2010, 19:11   #20
Martab
Distinguished Member
 
Martab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Verona
Posts: 4,419
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikael View Post
-1 read Mijke´s post nr 2 and 8

Ii is to be 77-1 I think

Very best regards / Mikael
I understand that you wish to include only dogs with HD and ED results. And I think that this is the wish everyone has.
But in this moment we have to consider that dogs without ED results are included, whereas dogs with not positive ED results are excluded.

I believe that the FIRST STEP to be taken is to include all dogs with or without ED results, and not to discriminate dogs with "not perfect" ED results, as explained in the petition. (this is MY personal point of view, not the point of view of all the petitioners)

Only afterwards, we can think about new rules to be applied.
The point is that the actual situation is clearly unfair and discriminatory, and needs to be changed immediately.
Agreeing on the "new rules" to be applied is much more complicated, and requires reasonings to be shared...this is my thought but I am more than willing to consider different proposals
__________________

Marta & GlockArian
Martab jest offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:16.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) Wolfdog.org