Quote:
Originally Posted by elf
Remove the words "list" and "suspicious", I know writing it they were not well chosen, replace them by "breeding experiences shared knowledges".
Breeder X noticed that when crossing dog A with dog B, but also when crossing dog A with dog C, D or E, it gives always the particularity Y etc... so on for relatives... I guess there are a lot to share and it's would be easier access, so more used, if documented somewhere.
|
So if I get this right, this "breeding experiences shared knowledges database" will only be for dogs who have made "x" numbers of litters ? how many litters should that be to be sure that two or three choices of mate, was not just bad choices maked by the breeder(not all breeders have big experience) ? or in other words, how to be sure that the bitch(or stud dog) is due to the particular defect "Y" ? If only one litter is made, then who is to blame for defect ? and dosent matter who is to blame, what can you use it for(serious breeders want to see future mates with their own eyes, before choosing) ? I think to make such a database you must be 100% sure, so who will have authority to add info in this database, the breeders them selves or some judge ? I think non can be objective enough to make such a database ! I think this will just open for more accusations(true and false) on various breeders, but will not give 100% true datas on the breed !
I am sorry but I can not see/understand how to make such a database all facts/true 100% sure.... and if it is not 100% facts/true, what is the use for this ?
Rolf