View Single Post
Old 06-10-2011, 14:29   #8
admin
Moderator
 
admin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 583
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mijke View Post
European labs would get huge problems when they would publish test results (or share them with others besides the owner) In the past some did, but they did receive complains of breeders, so they did stop with this.

Now it is sometimes only possible for clubs to ask for percentages (without names).
But also this says NOTHING! Because owners make the tests in several labs in Europe and not in the same lab.
That's the point - there will be always honest breeders who will publish the results. And there will be always breeders hiding them. There are also CHEATERS who know that their dogs are ill but they tell the puppy owners that their dogs are healthy - the database with unofficial result can prevent it.

Additionally:
Publishing DM information do not "hurt" anyone - even the DM/DM dogs can be used for breeding - only the selection is important: not to mate such dogs with carriers but only with N/N dogs. The same apply to the carriers.

Publishing unofficial information can show possible dangers and can prevent that more DM/DM dogs are born. It is why I do not understand why some people are against it...
admin jest offline   Reply With Quote