Quote:
Originally Posted by Admin
I checked the "responsibility" of the official laboratories - you have written them on the pages which you received with the results:
The lab is accredited according to DIN ISO 17025 (AKS-PL-20922)
for the services mentioned above. Responsibility for the
correctness of animal ID data corresponding with the samples
lies in the hands of the sender. Warranty cannot be accepted.
Claim for damages is limited to the amount of the invoice for
the performed lab test if not otherwise regulated by law.
I think it ends the whole disscussion...
|
No is not the end. Off course lab don't have responsibility about right identification,i never said this..
damage is limited if not otherwise regulated by law..This does not mean it does not respond. You must to seek for rules for accreditation (i spoke aboute this, i think is clear)..research institute don't have accrditation to give official result, and research institute don't respond for error (about test, ID is another think)...why? and you want without any accreditation system recognized deduce part or all genotipe of dogs.
To avoid misunderstandings, I express my appreciation for the work performed by the research institute in Prague that has provided estimates on the incidence considerable allelic gene DM in the population of the CSW.