Go Back   Wolfdog.org forum > English > _Administration

_Administration Questions connected with Wolfdog.org, database and other technical matters....

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21-07-2009, 15:38   #1
Ricky's Wolf
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,939
Default Information about the list of the stud

Good afternoon,
I'd like to know if there are new laws about the list of the STUD.

Which he must have a male dog to be inserted in this list?

- Must not they be us dogs without bonitation?

No, because in this list there are much dog whit never bonitation.

- Must not they be us dogs with results of the dyplasia B or C or D ?

No, because in this list there are much dog whit result dysplasia B and C.
Is there straight some dog without not even the results of the dysplasia.

I don't understad what is the requisite that a dog must have for being inserted in this list.
Are there also perhaps some restrictions for the dogs that are not perfect of elbows?
Possible and respectable.
But because he must not be in this list a dog that, it for example, has the results of the elbows ED 0-1 (what does it correspond to a C) and must he be us a dog that has C of dysplasia instead? Or, worse still, why must be a dog that doesn't Have the results of the elbows?

In all list of all language there is this information:
Stud dogs:Bonitation code:Hip Dysplasia (HD):Offsprings:
And not elbows result.
If is to much important the elbows result, so much to remove dogs with ED 0-1 (not prefect, but almost perfect), because they are not also removed dogs that don't have the official results of the elbows?
Dont' have a elbows result is a lot of worse to be elbows little not perfect, is wrong me?
And still, the evaluation of the elbows ED 0-1 mean that 1 elbow is perfect (A) and 1 elbow ok but not perfect (C). Why must a dog with a result of the kind have removed while who is C still has displasia there is?

Mine is not at all a polemic but a verification and I would want to understand better

I'm sorry, but I have not Understood The Logic, can Someone Help to Understand me?
THANKS, YOU I'M SORRY FOR MY ENGLISH.
Riccardo Lubrano
Ricky's Wolf jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-07-2009, 20:03   #2
Juniorwolf
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 575
Default

Ciao Riccardo,

As far as I know, only official HD-result is needed to be at the stud dog list !

No bonitation or ED-results is neededand ...and if results of HD is A-B-C-D-E does not matter, the dog only need official HD result.

I can only say that I wish the list only would include dogs who have official HD + ED + Bonitation results.

Best greetings Rolf
Juniorwolf jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-07-2009, 09:26   #3
Kerstin
Junior Member
 
Kerstin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hessen
Posts: 317
Send a message via Skype™ to Kerstin
Default

Hello, I think it is confusing because there are different rules in each country.
There are countries where you do not need bonitation to have a stud dog. Or you do not need ED results. In the end each owner has to decide whats important for him/her. I think it is great to have this information availible- it is just up to me, what I do with it.

And when I find a good dog I can still ask the owner about what I want or need.

Maybe it would be interesting, what it takes to have a stud dog in the different countries of europe? What the rules are? Then you can decide if it makes sense, or not or if you want more or less.

Regards,
Kerstin
__________________
Kerstin jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-07-2009, 11:41   #4
Ricky's Wolf
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,939
Default

Thanks for the answers.
I think that it is true (as Kerstin says) that it is the ower of the female of dog to ask other information however if it is interested to a stallion.
But it is true also that the list of the stud of this site is also a list that directly or indirectly publicizes a dog.

They must be us of the requisite to insert a male dog in this list and they agree.
But the requisite must be correct and equivalent for everybody.
Lately a male dog has been removed in the Italian list with official results HD A and ED 0-1. Motive (perhaps) is because the dog to 1 elbow is not 0 but he is 1. Only 1.
Ok if the laws are this the laws they must have respected.
But the laws must be correct for all!
Why a dog with HD A and ED have 0-1 (almost perfect) been removed while they are continuing to be us dogs Without official results of ED?

If the results of the elbows are very important and fundamental, they must be important for all the dogs. Should not be the dogs without results of the elbows, or I am crazy to think this normal consequence to a law?

Why dogs are there with HD C? What equal is to the 1 of the ED...

For me is not correct.

I hope to be explains well me

I ask at all if somebody know other information about this situation.
And if somebody write what think about all this situation.
Regards from Rome

Last edited by Ricky's Wolf; 22-07-2009 at 11:48.
Ricky's Wolf jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-07-2009, 12:55   #5
massimo
Senior Member
 
massimo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Prague 6
Posts: 2,090
Send a message via ICQ to massimo Send a message via MSN to massimo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Runningwolf View Post
Lately a male dog has been removed in the Italian list with official results HD A and ED 0-1. Motive (perhaps) is because the dog to 1 elbow is not 0 but he is 1. Only 1.
Ok if the laws are this the laws they must have respected.
But the laws must be correct for all!
Why a dog with HD A and ED have 0-1 (almost perfect) been removed while they are continuing to be us dogs Without official results of ED?
Riccardo, i don't think the ED 0-1 is the reason a dog is removed from studlist.
There surely is a different reason.
Margo will reply to you about it as soon as possible (i suppose...)
massimo
__________________
----------
Oliver & Lunatica
massimo jest offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-07-2009, 11:02   #6
Ricky's Wolf
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by massimo View Post
Riccardo, i don't think the ED 0-1 is the reason a dog is removed from studlist.
There surely is a different reason.
Margo will reply to you about it as soon as possible (i suppose...)
massimo
Massimo I'm agree with you, in fact I'm waiting for an answer.

Is Strange however that of all the people that live this world of ours and that they live ours beautiful website anybody has not almost answered...
I'm waiting....
Ricky's Wolf jest offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:16.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) Wolfdog.org