![]() |
![]() |
|
_Administration Questions connected with Wolfdog.org, database and other technical matters.... |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 847
|
![]()
Thank you, admin
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Howling Member
|
![]()
Quick question on the new database...some dogs are listed with !!!MIX!!!, others with !!!Non-FCI!!! - there is another group of dogs that says
!!!REG!!! - what does this refer to? Thanks!
__________________
"What lies behind us and what lies ahead of us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us."~Henry David Thoreau http://www.galomyoak.com ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bad Dürkheim
Posts: 2,249
|
![]() Quote:
Non-FCI means kennels that are no registered FCI-kennels, what means no FCI-pedigrees. The German kennel "vom Böhmerwald" is a kennel but not member of the VDH/FCI. Reg very likely means registered dogs, in the FCI there is the possibility of phenotype-registration. Dogs that look like a breed can get registration pedigrees and their offspring gets this kind of pedigrees for as far as I remember 4 generations, after that they get normal pedigrees. If you take for example Amber, she is of parents with full FCI-pedigree but not bred under any kennel but underwent phenotype-registration. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Howling Member
|
![]() Quote:
Marcy
__________________
"What lies behind us and what lies ahead of us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us."~Henry David Thoreau http://www.galomyoak.com ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bad Dürkheim
Posts: 2,249
|
![]()
No, the phenotype registration only needs a dog that looks like a CSW. There are registered Mutaras and others. Wolfdog only has them as mixes if they know they are.
Originally registration was a good thing for breeds like for example the Picard which has not so many FCI-registered dogs but there are still working dogs with shepherds without pedigrees. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
Marcy, were you alluding to the AKC's FSS' take on registering dogs with no known parents so long as the dog physically resembles said breed? That's effectively an open stud book and that that worries me too ... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bad Dürkheim
Posts: 2,249
|
![]()
Yes, it is available in the FCI but the Slovakian Club decided not to accept registered dogs and doesn´t register as far as I know.
But it can´t be prevented that other countries register them and that was how the Mutaras got into breeding. http://www.wolfdog.org/deu/dbase/d8668.html It would make sense in the case of dogs like Amber to get a paternal DNA for proof and than at least give informations in the registry-papers but the parents and other ancestors don´t show up in the papers. So all information is lost. I don´t think registration is bad in general if it is handled with paternal proof or like in the case of the Picard helps to get more dogs into the breeding gene pool but it gets a big problem with mixes or parents that didn´t fullfill the the breeding rules by failing the health tests that are required. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|