|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Merseyside, UK
Posts: 27
|
IMO, what is needed to form the basis for the KC registration and to build up relations within europe is trust, plain and simple. and to attain this, both breeders and owners need to be upfront about their motives, past, present and future.
i don't think "ruling out" owners of mongrels will change much, because it is the owners themselves and their attitudes that will be the driving force behind the recognition overall. obviously pure bred CsV's are an important and vital factor to it all, but i dont think its right the rule out others just because they haven't got a pure CsV. i mean, take myself for example, i don't own a csv, therefore i have just as much of a standing as somebody who owns a mongrel, does that mean i am also not passionate about the breed? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
rookie
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Merseyside, UK
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
i also agree with you when you say that there can be no doubt of the purity of the dogs that are registered for the KC recognition, as there needs to be solid and pure bloodlines present for this breed to move forward. please dont take me wrong, im not trying to stand up for the breeders of mixes. i just dont think its right to rule out anybody else with involvement/a passion for the csv. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
rookie
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Vidin
Posts: 391
|
Quote:
Unfortunately, the current 'breeders' past motives have been to mix to make money (they are not doing it to preserve or improve a breed, so what other reason is there?) - and they don't see anything wrong in that Last edited by Shadowlands; 22-09-2011 at 13:47. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
rookie
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|