Galiba guilty ??

[AMERICANI]

In defense of the breeder, who apparently is 100% confident that no problems have stemmed from there kennel, I recommend to them (in there best interest) to give DNA samples from Galiba and the "red Saarloos" and send them in to the officials for the sake of their honor since it seems everyone is "out to get them". They obviously have nothing to hide; they even said so!

[ArImInIuM]

Originariamente inviata da Admin

There is another possibility - if the matings were made unintentionally (because for example Dvorack or the females excaped from the cages) the females can be really covered by Galiba but ALSO by the red Saarloos. So there is a possibility that even in one litter some puppies can be sired by Galiba and some by the red Saarloos.

Of course there are some arguments against the word "unintentionally" - first because it seems that the same story repeated again and again. Second good argument given by one of the breeders is that fact that CW kennel base on breeding and rising money - there was no logical explanation for buying a MALE Saarloos in a country where there were NO females for mating. In all neighbor coutries there were maybe 3-4 females. So from the "economic" point of view owning a Saarloos made no sence.

But there is also (almost) no possibility that Galiba is Saarloos mix - he was born 2002.01.14. Dvorack (the Saarloos) on 05/10/2003 - we have no information when he joined the CW pack but basing on this information we can say that the CW litter A (1999.02.03) - M (2004.01.31) are pure. In fact there were also no untypical characteristics appearing by the offsprings of those dogs.

The red puppies born in the litter of Thalia and Sibir show that a red Saarloos was "involved" in this line. There are problems with the colours, Saarloos character and exterier appearing by the offsprings of "V". Now it seems also by "R".

So it would be good idea to make the parentage test of ALL Galiba offsprings. Galiba is still alive - his offsprings too. There would be a possiblity to take the blood of Galiba (by a OFFICIAL comission) - send it to Laboklin or Antagene and to send there also the blood of his puppies. The owners would get confirmation that their dogs are sired by Galiba (or not).

What is also unknown: there is the possiblity that also other litters can be sired by a Saarloos. At least there are some "strange" things happening also by some other litters - as the mentioned "Y" CW. In this case the same thing can be done - the blood of Issar can be stored by Laboklin or Antagene and the owners can get certificates confirming that their dogs are sired by him.

In this case at least some dogs can be cleared without any "help" of CW-breeder (who is not interested to help anybody).

Then what are you waiting for these tests?
Galiba that passed away?

it would be a lot of innocent dogs

[yukidomari]

Originariamente inviata da ArImInIuM

Then what are you waiting for these tests?
Galiba that passed away?

it would be a lot of innocent dogs

I don't think Galiba's owner or owner of other suspected CW dogs is cooperating at all, and there isn't any 'dog police' which can compel or force such an action upon an owner :/

[ArImInIuM]

Originariamente inviata da yukidomari

I don't think Galiba's owner or owner of other suspected CW dogs is cooperating at all, and there isn't any 'dog police' which can compel or force such an action upon an owner :/

and yet when I read the many posts I really feel that we are in full Judgement without evidence, with little chance to defend themselves properly because even openly asking what evidence we have, things n 'no change, worse, they get worse with each new "discoveries" to each new revelation unfounded, just based on "one says" ......

[admin]

Originariamente inviata da ArImInIuM

Then what are you waiting for these tests?
Galiba that passed away?

I can not go to Hungary. I can not ask for the blood - especially that the breeder is against the tests.

The ONLY people who can make it are the owners of the puppies - they can ask for it OFFICIALLY due to the fact that the whole can IS suspicious.

Originariamente inviata da ArImInIuM

and yet when I read the many posts I really feel that we are in full Judgement without evidence, with little chance to defend themselves properly because even openly asking what evidence we have, things n 'no change, worse, they get worse with each new "discoveries" to each new revelation unfounded, just based on "one says" ......

Please read the topic once again.

There are red puppies born. IT IS A FACT. The b-colour NEVER existed by our breed. SECOND FACT. The parents of the red puppies are Crying Wolf CsW. THIRD FACT. And the Saarloos was/is living by the CW breeder is another fact.

That the cages by CW are not "Wolfdog-proof" and that the breeder is AFFRAID to make any DNA tests are just another small facts. And there is much much more...

Do you have another explanation how the red colour (bb) appeared by Crying Wolf and why it is present ONLY THERE?


I really undserstand the problem of Galiba-offspring owners BUT if we will not solve the problem NOW in few years we will have MUCH MORE "Galiba" offsprings. What will happend when (new) DNA tests will show that some offsprings of Galiba are Saarloos crossees? NOBODY WILL ASK THE OWNERS - nobody will care. The dogs - ALL OF THEM - will lose the pedigrees.
Do you want to be one of the people who will be responsible for it? We NOT.


The whole problem looks like this: you are trying to protect Galiba-offsprings owners. There is the possiblity that some of the dogs are mixes - and some not. It seems that some of them are kept for "guilty" deservedly.

What we are trying to do is to protect purebreed CsW-breeders. They do not want to breed mixes - and they really ask to mark ALL suspicious lines. Because they don't want to use ANY possible mixes. It is not about not using the CW dogs or dogs from any other kennels. But abnout not using any untypical dogs which can be a mix.
If you will ask the breeders you will consider that there was no such casee for MANY years in Germany, Czech Republic or Slovakia. The same apply as far I know to Lithuania and Poland. It was sure that the dogs bred there are pure. But now also this pure populations can be destroyed - "thanks" to the French and Hungarian mixes.

My suggestion: WE can not do anything. We are not a organization. But the breed clubs in the origin countries ARE. Ask them for help - they can speak with the Hungarian kennel club and send a breeding comittee with veterinarian who will OFFICIALLY take the blood of the suspiciousd dogs. I think they will be interested due to the fact that some of the suspicious dogs are living also in CZ and SK.

So far I like the behaviour of two male owners: Juri and Issar. Thanks to it the cases of "Y" and "P" litter from Crying Wolf can be solved pretty fast. The blood of Juri is as far I know already stored. So the owners of the "P"-litter can test their dogs. Mother of this litter - Yolka - was sold to "nowhere". But the second owner - of Issar - Sona Bognarova is was prepared to offer the blood of Issar for testing. So the "Y"-CW owners will have the possiblity to test their dogs too.
It do not solve the "real" problem of "Galiba" offsprings but at least few CW owners will have the possiblity to sleep calm.

[admin]

Originariamente inviata da ArImInIuM

and yet when I read the many posts ......

I see you are from France - you country is the best example what will happend when we will not care about purebreed breeding. Whan you will take a look on othe CsW population in other countries you will see that the Saarloos mixes story will not make bugger damage to them - there are only FEW dogs which can be "afflicted".

In France you have the situation showing what will happend if the breeders will not care for the fact that some dogs look and some are for 100 % MIXES.
If the breeders do not care and use all the Saarloos, AWD and White Shepherd crosses and the Kennel Club do not make anything to verify the pedigrees even in the cases where cheating is OBVIOUS the only result you get is a population where maybe the biggest part of the population is not purebreed and the peidgrees are worth NOTHING.

No - we really preffer to verify (or to suspect) more dogs than needed. Than to allow them to breed and to spread what will cause that soon we will have to change the name of this breed to "Czechoslovakian Mongrel" or to "French-Czecho-Slovakian White-Saarloos-Malamute-Shepherd-something-wolfdogs"...

[ArImInIuM]

Originariamente inviata da Admin

There are red puppies born. IT IS A FACT. The b-colour NEVER existed by our breed. SECOND FACT. The parents of the red puppies are Crying Wolf CsW. THIRD FACT. And the Saarloos was/is living by the CW breeder is another fact.




I really undserstand the problem of Galiba-offspring owners BUT if we will not solve the problem NOW in few years we will have MUCH MORE "Galiba" offsprings. What will happend when (new) DNA tests will show that some offsprings of Galiba are Saarloos crossees? NOBODY WILL ASK THE OWNERS - nobody will care. The dogs - ALL OF THEM - will lose the pedigrees.
Do you want to be one of the people who will be responsible for it? We NOT.


The whole problem looks like this: you are trying to protect Galiba-offsprings owners. There is the possiblity that some of the dogs are mixes - and some not. It seems that some of them are kept for "guilty" deservedly.

What we are trying to do is to protect purebreed CsW-breeders. They do not want to breed mixes - and they really ask to mark ALL suspicious lines. Because they don't want to use ANY possible mixes. It is not about not using the CW dogs or dogs from any other kennels. But abnout not using any untypical dogs which can be a mix.
If you will ask the breeders you will consider that there was no such casee for MANY years in Germany, Czech Republic or Slovakia. The same apply as far I know to Lithuania and Poland. It was sure that the dogs bred there are pure. But now also this pure populations can be destroyed - "thanks" to the French and Hungarian mixes.


.

Now I ask this question:
Are you sure that there is no other red puppies in other farms but these farms have not declared the puppies to avoid being put in default?
I've seen in other races unreported atypical color not to be excluded from probgrammes dde selection with the fear of being misjudged.
I highly doubt that e is only the fault of the French and Hungarian, sorry ...
seen the mess that it has a transaprence from a French breeder, I highly doubt that another breeder make such a statement one day seamlessly, because even me, if such a thing happened, I do not show everyone. I have two more of Galiba down, so more reason not to other descendants in the Tourment.
by against, what I would do is a DNA test with the search for gene "B" on my four dogs and do my comparison.
as I put on a French post, looking at best practice, the possibility of a marriage to some accidental Dvorak (the Saarloos) would represent more than one dog on worries Because of this litter were born 3 males but only one has reproduced Sibir and if this is the case( sirius and siegfried and reported no puppies), you can pay tribute to the farm that has been transparent, because with this statement, we could isolate the problem now and not in 10 years.
before condemning all the descendants of Galibi, do not you think it would be simpler to test in the first place the marriage with flash crying wolf?

[Juri Z.P.]

publicly here.

DNA profiles from juri is at laborklin :-)!

I pay the DNA of my puppy!!!

I hope so sign up owners ...

owners from Juri Puppy "P" ....
please contact me :-)

[yukidomari]

Originariamente inviata da Juri Z.P.

publicly here.

DNA profiles from juri is at laborklin :-)!

I pay the DNA of my puppy!!!

I hope so sign up owners ...

owners from Juri Puppy "P" ....
please contact me :-)

What a great attitude!

[Rona]

Originariamente inviata da yukidomari

What a great attitude!

Exactly! Transparent and cooperative!

[mijke]

Originariamente inviata da Admin

But there is also (almost) no possibility that Galiba is Saarloos mix - he was born 2002.01.14. Dvorack (the Saarloos) on 05/10/2003 - we have no information when he joined the CW pack but basing on this information we can say that the CW litter A (1999.02.03) - M (2004.01.31) are pure. In fact there were also no untypical characteristics appearing by the offsprings of those dogs.

For sure Galiba is not a SWH mix!
I did bring Dvorack on 10-04-2004 to CZ (you even can see this in gallery: http://www.wolfdog.org/site/nl/gallery/cat/5/0/78 )
And a few weeks later Dvorack did join the CW pack in Hungary.

[massimo]

I have seen Dvorak many times and from what I remember he should be sterilized since years and he is younger than Galiba.
Don't you think we are really hunting down ghosts? getting proper info instead of spreading shit around would be more appropriate, don't you think?

I really do NOT think that you are investigating on the right direction...

[Morian]

massimo, maybe this is the second coming of christ??

[massimo]

no...i don't believe in miracles...i believe there are breeders who lie and cheat and make false papers and maybe even false tests...
i just don't think that the country is right...
there is too much mess going on...DM results which do not correspond, strange colours...ORDER should be established (i wrote it ages ago but mostly i was ignored, because it's better to attack aimlessly and destroy than to be creative and focus...)
I will wait and see...

[Nebulosa]

Originariamente inviata da massimo

I have seen Dvorak many times and from what I remember he should be sterilized since years and he is younger than Galiba.

Should, but he did officially an Sarloos litter in 2007, means that till this time he wasn't sterelized, it fits perfectly with the birth data of the S (2005), V (2006) and Y (2007) litter born as CzW in Crying Wolf kennel.

[michaelundinaeichhorn]

Originariamente inviata da massimo

i just don't think that the country is right...

Exactly, you are absolutely right.

[massimo]

Originariamente inviata da Nebulosa

Should, but he did officially an Sarloos litter in 2007, means that till this time he wasn't sterelized, it fits perfectly with the birth data of the S (2005), V (2006) and Y (2007) litter born as CzW in Crying Wolf kennel.

The doubts are also on Y litter??
Father of Y is Issar, owner is Sona Bognarova, not Edit Molnar so why not ask DNA samples to her?

[yukidomari]

Originariamente inviata da massimo

The doubts are also on Y litter??
Father of Y is Issar, owner is Sona Bognarova, not Edit Molnar so why not ask DNA samples to her?

Ms. Bognarova answered the question here:
http://www.wolfdog.org/forum/showpos...&postcount=130

Appears that Issar is at CW kennels. I do not know if DNA has been carried out since Ms. Bognarova posted in June of this year.