![]() |
![]() |
|
Sport & training Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs as working dogs - how to train, how to teach new elements, information about competitions and training seminars... |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
|
![]()
Hello Eva,
Quote:
the greatest differences, I think, are in the method how specific parts of the exam are being carred out and are being judged. You can show the dog every command with hands and also say the command during ZVV3 (it would result in penalty point in IPO3). You cannnot give commands to the dog when changing direction during IPO and SchH (it's acceptable for ZVV). And also the judges during ZVV, as I observed, do not apply such big attention as IPO judges to the principle that every command should be executed with happiness. There is ever a non-official regulation in IPO that the dog can maximaly get 90 points of 100 possible for obedience part if all parts were made 100%correctly but were done without visible satisfaction of the dog. Other example is the tracking part: sure the track is longer and older for ZVV3 than for IPO3 (about 1000m and 3h old for ZVV3 and 600m and 1h old for IPO3) but during IPO3 it is required that the dog goes all the time with its nose by the ground and every single raising of the head can be assessed with penalty point. In ZVV the more important is the result of the whole tracking not the style (I don't say the style is unimportant but it's sure less important than in IPO). Simple said ZVV checks how the dog mastered all parts of exam and IPO required additionaly that all parts should be made showily. From the dog handler IPO requires a 100% self-control (without any unnecessary moves). Greetings, Przemek |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|