![]() |
![]() |
|
_Administration Questions connected with Wolfdog.org, database and other technical matters.... |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kraków
Posts: 3,509
|
![]()
I'm not Admin, and I might be wrong, but to me the -!- shows that a dog comes from a line of dog(s) that were bred by a breeder who had "suspicious" litters in his/her kennel.
Seems to me it does not concern the dog or dogs, but breeder (s). Should owners of such marked dogs imposed pressure on the "suspicious" breeders and made them test the parents of the litters in question, the problem would probably be very quickly sorted out and the marks would hopefully disapear. Simple, easy and the last chance to have it solved because dogs live much shorter than humans and soon there won't be many living dogs to test ![]() ![]() If any of you finds it hard to have the breeder of his dog(s) taken blood for DNA testing, it only means you've chosen a poor and unreliable kennel. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kecskemét,Külsőnyír 155/a
Posts: 44
|
![]()
The problem:
Lara Crying Wolf "clean" line, also Odette. The suspicion arose not mixing. And I, as a breeder .... what can I do?? There is also evidence of the shakes? Because if not, this is slander .... Again I ask: What am I to do?? and from my dog I take blood .... and what do I get it?? We call it a mixture of my dogs? example: Crying Wolf Lara Father: Hron Radov Dvor Mother: Uma Crying Wolf Which is mixture? And on what basis? Do you think the FCI pedigree certificate is false? What it can do without proof? Last edited by Norky; 13-03-2012 at 15:23. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 3121 Somoskőújfalu Somosi út 161.
Posts: 37
|
![]()
Dear Admin!
If you have evidence for the symbols, write it down for everyone, if you don't, then take down the symbols immediately. Because if someone goes to the court, you will have to pay much if you don't write down the truth. I'm sure all of us would like to know the meaning behind these symbols, but we still have no answers for them. I only write something about someone if I can back it up with proof. Or is the money leading you to wreck other's reputation apart? This way, you'll never become a good dog breader. I'm waiting for your answer, even in PM. Varga István, Neckartal Kennel Hungary |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Moderator
|
![]()
I think Admin had made mention of this upcoming change in earlier posts. For example:
http://www.wolfdog.org/forum/showpos...30&postcount=6 Though the thread was primarily about French dogs, it can be applicable to all dogs where there is reasonable question as to the integrity of their pedigree. I believe - again, my belief, Admin may clarify later - that all the marked dogs are basically on a 'to-watch' basis. Not that they have been proven to be. And if DNA tests will be done all the marked dog and all earlier marked generations, it will be clarified. At this point I think many dogs from Crying Wolf kennels are marked if the stud used was also a dog residing at Crying Wolf (and not if the stud dog is belonging to somebody else and living elsewhere). It is because there is evidence that the purported sire on the pedigree is not who was actually used (for example, appearance of red-colored dogs). It doesn't even mean the marked dogs are possible mixes - it could be that the stud dog is a CZW, just not the one on the pedigree. I guess a dog can also be marked if in their shared litter there were very suspicious dogs which may be mixes.. There are a lot of IFs.. But at the same time one cannot deny there are some 'funny' and 'miraculous' things showing up in litters! I think it would be in everyone's and the breed's best interest to seek the resolution of their dogs' pedigree. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Parma
Posts: 87
|
![]()
Thanks to the widespread use of the site wolfdog.org in Europe, the behavior of the owner of the domain (Margo Peron) and the Administrator officially declared (Paula Pandolfo) makes them complicit with this phantom admin of defamation and unfair competition, offenses punishable by European laws implemented by individual member states, especially in the Criminal Code. I agree with Martha that it is not worth to an individual owner to sue for them, but if the situation is not resolved quickly, I invite anyone interested to contact me to study the possibility to make a common cause. It's cleare that with any proof and no evidence of nothing, admin can not sign as a mix a dog that have all document complitely in order. The only reason admin have is the one to preserve owner of the website, is kennel and his soldier as Daive is in a world where today competition is strong and them dog are not at level of other. As reading in other page now is time that wolfdog.org understand that he is not referrent of the breed.
Massimiliano Paini and Zenith od Uhoste (purebreed - world winner 2011 - top dog enci 2011) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Ottokar lovers
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 271
|
![]() Quote:
I don't think so. This is just a desperate act out of frustration, stirring the pot, not a solution. Not at all. We have a saying: when pointing at someone else with one finger, it is actually pointing at one self with the other 4 fingers. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,061
|
![]()
The question is how reliable this website is at the moment. Several dogs are marked with ? or ! without any form of an explanation.
It looks to me almost like a withcraft to several breeders, and without any eplanation. As it is a private website wouldn't it be easier to just stop this website as nobody can be trusted? Maybe you can start by removing al the information from my dog that I did provide to you, all the medical and pictures please. Thank you for you help greetings judith |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,061
|
![]()
my dog has breeding rights in the netherlands and I did sent you all the results , and stil no answer about why he has no breeding rights on wolfdog. His DNA and B locus have been openly published also.. so tell me why....
or is the only reason you hate his breeder?
__________________
Groetjes judith |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 583
|
![]() Quote:
It's not about hate. It is a fact that in the Crying Wolf kennel came to the crossings of Saarloos wolfdog male and Czechoslovakian Wolfdog females and at least litter "T" and "S" are mixes Saarloos x Wolfdog. There are serious doubts as to the other dogs in the kennel. At the moment, together with breeders I try to find the most painless solution, which, however, will prevented a spread of such mixes among the breed. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,061
|
![]()
The saarloos was a red saarloos, and I already check his B locus (which results you already have) so he is not a direct descendent from a red saarloos.
__________________
Groetjes judith |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 583
|
![]()
I've heard such an argument, but it is incorrect. BB locus test makes sense only in first generation. According to the Mendelian inheritance rule already in the second-generation descendants of Saarloos may have BB although they are "still" Saarloos mixes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
CAN I know please,because my f litter (lupifelix)has been marked with this symbol (!)
I think that wolfdog.org has not only degraded to a commercial tool ,but i' afraid i'm in wrong :-(
__________________
www.lupifelix.it |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Loyre de Aralla Kennel
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Madrid
Posts: 6
|
![]()
Good afternoon
First of all apologize for my bad English After communication of Slovak Czechoslovakian wolf dog club, what happens to the puppies born from parents of crying wolf breeder if his birth is after two years of the stay of saarlos at crying wolf breeder, for example Murad Crying Wolf and his descendants. I am the owner of Hacker de La Gretosa, who is the son of Murad Crying Wolf and Latka z Peronówki. As I can dispel doubts about my dog and clear the exclamation mark which in the name of my dog??? Thank you very much Greetings from Spain |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Moderator
|
![]()
Please remove the ? by the whole E-Crying Wolf litter. And all their offsprings: http://www.wolfdog.org/pl/dbase/d/23149
The litter E was registered in Hungary but it was bred by Milan Budaj (Slovakia). He covered Arys with his dog Hitt and sold her to Edith first later. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Arimminum Kennel
|
![]()
This is a wrong information, Arys in 2008 was in the kennel Crying Wolf of Edith. I was present when Edit made progesteron to the two females (Arys z Oravy and Ariminum Andromeda ,my female)from his vet. She went in Slovakia for coupled Arys with Hitt. Surely the litter is just like other litters of Edith. The problem is with the litter Y,it is essential to take the test dna.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 583
|
![]()
Because of mixing Saarloos and Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs in the Hungarian kennel "Crying wolf" all dogs from this kennel born after 2004 became suspicious.
Despite the lack of cooperation of the mentioned breeder the owners managed to clean up some of the suspicion - breeders do not have to worry about using those dogs for breeding. Crying Wolf dogs with confirmed parentage: Yvain Crying Wolf Gisotsu Crying Wolf Evander Crying Wolf |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Can I know because only the litters of Cuma (my girl) have this sign(!)? and the other sisters, and some litters from echo does not have any signs? There are breeders nicest and other less ? we made too wolfish dogs? or is there another reason?
__________________
www.lupifelix.it |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 583
|
![]()
I'm trying to clean the mess with the !,? and other signs. Anyway all offspring of Echo will be marked because till now I did not received the parentage test (due to the fact that Echo comes from Crying Wolf - the kennel breeding Saarloos-Czech mixes).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Loyre de Aralla Kennel
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Madrid
Posts: 6
|
![]()
And my dog why? "Hacker de la Gretosa" son of Murad Crying Wolf (Amore Mio Srdcerváč x Arys z Oravy).
When the document speaks of the litter Y Crying Wolf does not speak for any of matches Saarlos with litter M. It is possible that if my dog being MIX evidence is provided that is charged, as is the duty of providing evidence accusing my logical thinking, otherwise why would the witch-hunts of the 16th century. Also now that her grandmother is dead how easy it is to accuse, right? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 583
|
![]()
All dogs from the kennel Crying wolf born since 2004 are marked as "MIXes". It is the result of a lack of authorization to conduct DNA testing of individual litters and dogs which tried to do not only do the owners of dogs from this kennel, but also the official clubs. Since the Hungarian Kennel Club does not control their breeders, and the owner of "Crying wolf" kennel (which crossed Saarloos and Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs - mixes are min litters S and R and their offsprings) refuses to cooperate (which shows the fear of detection of other crosses) I decided to introduce such drastic measures.
The way to remove the "MIX" is very easy - just show the dog's paternity leading to the dogs bred in Slovakia or Czech Republic. In this case the mother is a bitch from Slovakia, all you need to do is to show that the male listed in the pedigree of Murad is real father of this dog (and it is not one of the Crying Wolf mixes owners by the Crying Wolf kennel). In this way, I already cleared of the charges following dogs and all offsprings: Yvain Crying Wolf and Gisotsu Crying Wolf. I'm sorry about that, but we are dealing with the breeder-swindler. And, unfortunately, the puppies have to be regarded as the results of possible subsequent frauds made by this person. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|