Is there at least one working line in the breed of csw?

[massimo]

Originally Posted by Przemek

Yes. Fast example:
Asta z Tondova - 23 offsprings from which 5 has at least ZVV1 - it makes 5/23 = 21,74%

Originally Posted by Przemek

And I mentioned 6 wolfdogs that were shy (and I mean really scared dogs not just less couriagous) - 6/34 = 17,64%. I bet that this percentage is also higher than in many other lines.
So we have theoretically a chance of 8% that the offspring of Hasso will have IPO and 17% that it will shy and will pass no exams

Ok let's stop playing with numbers, i know I started in the first place
Asta is an excellent example of what I mean, but I doubt you can find many many others...
The example of shyness i don't think fits because from all sons of Hasso you mention only 6 of the sons made with Cira Volani rodu, and i honestly wouldn't compare shyness (present in a EXTREEMLY HIGH percentage of CSW...) with an Ipo1..

Originally Posted by Przemek

What I cannot deny is that usually a wolfdog with higher amount

Well that's the only thing I am trying to say.
If I wanted to work with a dog, I would surely take a pup from (or from a very near offspring of) one of these dogs:
Asta, Ajbix, Kelt, Argos, Hero, Hasso, Upstream...etc.
I wouldn't personally choose a son of others if that was my intention. Maybe your're right, maybe it's just a self-fulfilling prophecy, I want a working dog, i take a hypothetic working line, i work hard and i contribute to make a working line so.
it's a matter of choice.
I know what I would choose..and I surely know WHAT PARENTS i would NEVER CHOOSE if wanted to work with a csw....(I could make many examples ...)

Originally Posted by Przemek

Don't we have equality of rights? What about females? Why do you say that the character is inherited only from the father side?

of course but obviously it's easier for a male to make more puppies in his lifespan than a female (in the list i mentioned before there are 3 females...)

Of course at the end Saschia's example is and must be considered, and is repeating the same as said both by Przemek and myself before: NO exams doesn't necessarily mean No good for working, just that exams is a proof that "no exams" cannot give, and also that a big contribution to so called working lines is given by the owners...