Litters with unknow HD-results: should be removed or not?

Rona · 02-11-2008, 14:14

But why use A,B or C categories or colours that mean/indicate categories? Why not put letter symbols by the litters, and by clicking at them they would open the explanation, just like it is with the bonitation codes.

BX/BX (would mean both parents bonitated and X-rayed)
BX/X (both parents X-rayed, one additionally bonitated)
X/X (both parents X-rayed, none of them bonitated)
UX/X (one parent without HD result, another X-rayed, none of them bonitated)
UX/BX (one parent unX-rayed, another bonitated and X-rayed)
etc.

In this way boniation would be an important asset of the dog, but it's lack - not a particular disadvantage, HD result - a basic asset but the lack of X , i.e. the UX - an indicated disadvantage.

In this way X/X would be the minimal standard advised to the buyer to look for, and XB/XB - the highest. On the other hand, the system would have more informative character than judgemental.

Any reaction to this?

View Poll Results: Litters with unknow HD-results: should be removed?
Yes	20	54.05%
No	17	45.95%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

02-11-2008, 14:14	#18
Rona Distinguished Member Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Kraków Posts: 3,509	But why use A,B or C categories or colours that mean/indicate categories? Why not put letter symbols by the litters, and by clicking at them they would open the explanation, just like it is with the bonitation codes. BX/BX (would mean both parents bonitated and X-rayed) BX/X (both parents X-rayed, one additionally bonitated) X/X (both parents X-rayed, none of them bonitated) UX/X (one parent without HD result, another X-rayed, none of them bonitated) UX/BX (one parent unX-rayed, another bonitated and X-rayed) etc. In this way boniation would be an important asset of the dog, but it's lack - not a particular disadvantage, HD result - a basic asset but the lack of X , i.e. the UX - an indicated disadvantage. In this way X/X would be the minimal standard advised to the buyer to look for, and XB/XB - the highest. On the other hand, the system would have more informative character than judgemental. Any reaction to this? __________________