|
|
|
|||||||
| _Administration Questions connected with Wolfdog.org, database and other technical matters.... |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| _Administration Questions connected with Wolfdog.org, database and other technical matters.... |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
06-10-2011, 22:07
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Rio Grande do Sul
Posts: 1,334
  |
Then, if there is an dwarf pup in the litter mean both parents might be carrier of the gene, even if they haven't the official results, will it be published?
__________________
|
|
|
|
07-10-2011, 00:54
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Warnsveld
Posts: 2,033
|
Quote:
  Maybe I then can ask all the CsW dwarf owners for permission to publish  Sorry just a joke! I know owners who did not want to harm the breeder (because he/she is a good one and did have bad luck with the combination) And that was the only reason these owners did not want to share the test info. Also there are owners with "probably dwarfs" , but I'll never publish this without official test results. This all is for me a very complicated matter...... Because: I know some people or clubs in several countries still deny dwarfism is an issue in the breed....... I know there are more CsW's carrier of this mutation then were ever published..... I know breeders who have (proven) carriers breed with no tested dogs..... So sometimes I become very sad about this all........... 
__________________
Vriendelijke groeten, Mijke PS: I am not a moderator anymore!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-10-2011, 10:51
|
#3 | |
|
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kraków
Posts: 3,509
|
Quote:
E.g.if the pups owners of certian litter test their dogs, openly publish the results and in that litter the results are n/n, n/dm, dm/dm it is clear that both parents must be n/dm. So it does not matter if the parents' owner publish the results or not - they just become "visible" Should DWARF test be cheaper and thus more available and common - the effect would be the same - impossiblity of hiding the results by breeders, (unlike in the case of HD or ED) Thanks to Daniela's project DM result is no longer a taboo, but becomes a "public" issue. For me struggling for the secrecy of the DM results is ... suspicious. If somebody claims he breeds transparently he should not try to hide them, even if they are unofficial (provided this is clearly stated!) 
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-10-2011, 11:29
|
#4 |
|
http://www.srdcervac.wbs.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Unhošť - Nouzov
Posts: 1,313
|
the basic difference between HD, ED and DM:
For dysplasia - we assess (select) phenotype For degenerative myelopathy - we assess (select) genotype |
|
|
|
|
07-10-2011, 11:40
|
#5 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 472
|
a scotts-man... great
tapadh leidh, cuideachd sidh! hm...das ist reflexiv, oder?
__________________
Kein Mensch darf mir meine Schwächen so deutlich zeigen, wie meine (Wolfs-)Hunde es tun. |
|
|
|
|
07-10-2011, 12:44
|
#6 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Křivoklát
Posts: 62
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
